Family woman who died from cervical cancer after being 'fobbed off' by GPs given £15,000 damages

The family of a 25-year-old Surbiton woman who died of cervical cancer after feeling "fobbed off" by her GPs have won £15,000 damages at the High Court.

Sophie Hague died at home in November 2011 after enduring a hysterectomy, two unsuccessful cycles of chemo-radiotherapy and emergency surgery from which she never recovered. Her mother Suzanne and fiance, David Rich, claimed there was an inappropriate delay in diagnosing Ms Hague, who visited Langley Medical Practice in November 2009 and February 2010 complaining of pain and bleeding.

She was not physically examined on either occasion or referred. Ms Hague was eventually diagnosed in June 2010, after she told her mother that she felt "fobbed off" by Dr John Dalzell and Dr Daniel Fish and a scan was arranged by the family. Counsel Adam Korn told Mr Justice Lewis in London that it was alleged that the GPs wrongly and negligently failed to take Ms Hague's complaints seriously enough and make an onward referral for specialist diagnosis and treatment. He added both doctors had admitted breach of duty and it was accepted that Ms Hague should have had a pelvic examination. But, there was a dispute over legal causation, with the defence arguing that earlier diagnosis and treatment would have made no difference to the outcome. Their case was that the tumour was so aggressive that Ms Hague would have died whenever surgery was performed.

Today, the judge told the High Court that Dr Dalzell and Dr Fish failed to exercise reasonable skill and care in their treatment of Ms Hague in November 2009 and February 2010. However, he added, on the balance of probabilities, the cancer would have recurred and Ms Hague would not have survived for five years, but would have died. That aspect of the claim for negligence and a claim for wrongful death did not succeed. It was agreed that if the court had decided that Ms Hague would have survived if she had been diagnosed earlier, the amount of compensation would be £225,000. As it found that the negligence did not cause her death, it was agreed that the appropriate sum was £15,000.

Comments

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

By posting content on Surbiton.com, you agree to adhere to the following guidelines.

  • Your username and password must only be used by you, keep them safe. If a posting is made using your username and password it will be considered to have been posted by you. If you have a friend who wants to use our site and post messages on the site, show them how to register.
  • Be courteous at all times, inciting racial hatred, posting abusive, obscene, threatening, harassing, defamatory, libellous or sexually explicit material or any material that is found to be offensive is not acceptable and we may suspend your username and password.
  • Retaliating to offensive posts causes more problems for other users on the discussion boards. Just report such messages to us using the Feedback link which is available at the top of every page or the 'report this' link associated with individual postings. We will act on every report we receive.
  • Please respect other people's work and do not post material that infringes copyright.
  • Do not post information that you know to be confidential or sensitive or otherwise in breach of the law. You should only post material that you know to be public knowledge. If you have any doubts do not post it on the site.
  • Never attempt to gain unauthorised access to any area of the site. This is known as hacking and is illegal.
  • Content posted represents the opinions of the author, and does not represent the opinions of Surbiton.com or its affiliates and has not been approved or issued by Surbiton.com. You should be aware that the other participants are strangers to you and may make statements which may be misleading, deceptive or wrong.
  • Spoofing or posing as another user is unacceptable. Anonymous users' postings should always be considered with suspicion.
  • Help keep Surbiton.com a safe place for information and opinion. Please alert us of any anti-social behaviour as described above.
Please note that Surbiton.com does not monitor the comments posted and we are therefore reliant upon users reporting antisocial behaviour.